Joint Statement: End the expansion of the EU’s EURODAC database

Europe’s (digital) borders must fall

End the expansion of the EU’s EURODAC database

Civil society calls for an end to the expansion of EURODAC, the EU database for the registration of asylum-seekers. EURODAC, designed to collect and store migrants’ data, is being transformed into an expansive, violent surveillance tool that will treat people seeking protection as crime suspects This will include children as young as 6 whose fingerprints and facial images will be integrated into the database.

EURODAC is being expanded to enforce the EU’s discriminatory and hostile asylum and migration policies: increasing deportations, detention and a broader climate of racialised criminalisation. The endless expansion of EURODAC must be stopped.

What is EURODAC?

Since its inception in 2003, the EU has repeatedly expanded the scope, size and function of EURODAC.

Created to implement the Dublin system and record the country responsible for processing asylum claims, it originally stored only limited information, mostly fingerprints, on a few categories of people: asylum-seekers and people apprehended irregularly crossing the EU’s borders. From the start, this system has been a means to enforce a discriminatory and harmful deportation regime, premised on a false framework of ‘illegality’ in migration.

After a first reform in 2013 allowing police to access the database, the EU continues to detach EURODAC from its asylum framework to re-package it as a system pursuing ‘wider immigration purposes’. The changes were announced in 2020 in the EU Migration Pact, the EU’s so-called ‘fresh start on migration’. Rather than a fresh start, the proposals contain the harshest proposals in the history of the EU’s migration policy: more detention, more violence, and a wider, evolved tool of surveillance in the EURODAC database to track, push back and deport ‘irregular’ migrants.

How is the EURODAC expansion endangering people’s human rights?

More people included into the database: Concretely EURODAC would collect a vast swathe of personal data (photographs, copies of travel and identity documents, etc.) on a wider range of people: those resettled, relocated, disembarked following search and rescue operations and arrested at borders or within national territories.

Data collection on children: The reform would also lower the threshold for storing data in the system to the age of six, extend the data retention periods and weaken the conditions for law enforcement consultation of the database.

Including facial images into the database: The reform also proposes the expansion to include facial images. Comparisons and searches run in the database can be based on facial recognition – a technology notoriously error-prone and unreliable that threatens the essence of dignity, nondiscrimination and privacy rights. The database functions as a genuine tool of violence as it authorises the use of coercion against asylum-seekers who refuse to give up their data, such as detention and forced collection. Not only do these changes contradict European data protection standards, they demonstrate how the EU’s institutional racism creates differential standards between migrants and non-migrants.

Access by law enforcement: EURODAC’s revamp also facilitates its connection to other existing EU migration and police databases as part of the so-called ‘interoperability’ initiative – the creation of an overarching EU information system designed to increase police identity checks of non-EU nationals, leading to increased racial profiling. These measures also unjustly equate asylum seekers with criminals. Lastly, the production of statistics from EURODAC data and other databases is supposed to inform future policymaking on migration movement trends. In reality, it is expected that they will facilitate illegal pushbacks and overpolicing of humanitarian assistance.

End the expansion of EURODAC

The EURODAC reform is a gross violation of the right to seek international protection, a chilling conflation of migration and criminality and an out-of-control surveillance instrument. The farright is already anticipating the next step, calling for the collection of DNA.

The EURODAC reform is one of many examples of the digitalisation of Fortress Europe. It is inconsistent with fundamental rights and will undermine frameworks of protection and rights of people on the move.

We demand:

  • That the EU institutions immediately reject the expansion of EURODAC.
  • For legislators to prevent further violence and ensure protection at and within borders when rethinking the EURODAC system.
  • For legislators and EU Member States to establish safe and regular pathways for migrants and protective reception conditions. 
  1. AG Nachhaltige Digitalisierung  
  2. Abolish Frontex  
  3. Access Now  
  4. Africa Solidarity Centre Ireland  
  5. AlgoRace/University of Córdoba  
  6. AlgorithmWatch  
  7. Àltera  
  8. Asociación Por Ti Mujer  
  9. Asociación Rumiñahui  
  10. Association for Legal Intervention (Stowarzyszenie Interwencji Prawnej)  
  11. AsyLex  
  12. Bits of Freedom  
  13. Blindspots  
  14. Bürgerrechte & Polizei/CILIP  
  15. CNCD-11.11.11  
  16. CNVOS Slovenia  
  17. Center for AI and Digital Policy (CAIDP)  
  18. Center for Information Technology and Development  
  19. Centre for Muslims’ Rights in Denmark – CEDA  
  20. Centre for Peace Studies  
  21. Chaos Computer Club  
  22. Civil Liberties Union for Europe  
  23. Coalizione Italiana per le Libertà e i Diritti civili (CILD)  
  24. D64  
  25. Danes je nov dan, Inštitut za druga vprašanja  
  26. Derechos Digitales  
  27. Digitalcourage  
  28. Digitale Gesellschaft  
  29. Društvo Parada ponosa (Ljubljana Pride Association)  
  30. European Anti-Poverty Network (EAPN)  
  31. Equinox Initiative for Racial Justice  
  32. Equipo Decenio Afrodescendiente- España  
  33.  Epicenter.works
  34. EuroMed Rights
  35. European Civic Forum  
  36. European Digital Rights (EDRi) 
  37. European Movement Italy
  38. European Network Against Racism (ENAR)  
  39. European Sex Workers Rights Alliance (ESWA)  
  40. Forum InformatikerInnen für Frieden und gesellschaftliche Verantwortung (FIfF)  
  41. Fundación CIVES  
  42. Fundacja Centrum Badań Migracyjnych  
  43. Greek Council for Refugees (GCR)  
  44. Greek Forum of Migrants  
  45. Greek Forum of Refugees  
  46. Helsinki Foundation for Human Rights  
  47. Hermes Center for Transparency and Digital Human Rights  
  48. Homo Digitalis  
  49. Homo Faber Association  
  50. I Have Rights  
  51. IDAY Liberia Coalition Inc.  
  52. Infokolpa  
  53. info.nodes  
  54. Initiative Center to Support Social Action “Ednannia”  
  55. Institucion De Asuntos Culturales De España  
  56. Institute Circle  
  57. International Rehabilitation Council for Torture Victims  
  58. International Women* Space  
  59. Irídia – Centre per la defensa dels drets humans  
  60. IT-Pol Denmark  
  61. Ivorian Community of Greece  
  62. KD Gmajna  
  63. KOK German NGO Network against trafficking in Human Beings  
  64. Kif Kif vzw  
  65. LDH – Ligue des droits de l’Homme France  
  66. La Strada International  
  67.  Lafede.cat – Organitzacions per a la Justícia Global  
  68. Legal Centre Lesvos
  69. Ligue algérienne pour la défense des droits de l’homme  
  70. Ligue des droits humains (Belgium)  
  71. Maison du Peuple d’Europe  
  72. Mobile Info Team  
  73. Naga  
  74. National Federation of Polish NGOs (OFOP)  
  75. netzbegrünung – Verein für Grüne Netzkultur e.V.  
  76. New Europeans International  
  77. Northern Lights Aid  
  78. Novact  
  79. Open Knowledge Foundation Germany  
  80. PIC – Legal Center for the Protection of Human Rights and the Environment
  81. Peace Institute  
  82. Platform for International Cooperation on Undocumented Migrants (PICUM)  
  83. Polish Migration Forum Foundation (Fundacja Polskie Forum Migracyjne)  
  84. Polish Women’s Strike  
  85. Politiscope  
  86. Privacy International  
  87. Privacy Network  
  88. Prostitution Information Center  
  89. Quaker Council for European Affairs  
  90. RED AMINVI  
  91. Racism and Technology Center  
  92. Red Umbrella Sweden  
  93. Refugee Law Lab, York University  
  94. Refugee Legal Support (RLS)  
  95. Revibra Europe  
  96. SOLIDAR & SOLIDAR Foundation  
  97. Samos Volunteers  
  98. Sans-Papiers Anlaufstelle Zürich SPAZ  
  99. Sea-Watch e.V. 
  100. Siempre vzw/asbl  
  101. Statewatch  
  102. Stichting LOS  
  103. Stop Wapenhandel  
  104. Stowarzyszenie Port, Przestrzeń otwarta  
  105. Taraaz  
  106. The Border Violence Monitoring Network  
  107. Waterford Integration Services  
  108. Yoga and Sport with Refugees  
  109. Zavod za kulturo raznolikosti Open
Share the Post:

Related Posts